Knowing your contraception options
Happy World Contraception Day everybody!
I think that the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) is an amazing invention which has allowed women a great deal of freedom, choice and control over their own fertility. It allowed women to work and earn money in a time where pregnancy meant the end of your career, it has allowed women to avoid pregnancy in instances where pregnancy and childbirth was too great a health risk for them, it allowed women to choose to have children at a time in their life they felt was best for them, and it brought women more sexual freedom. But… it has some downsides, some of which are strong enough that many women choose not to use the OCP, or are advised against it due to the health risks it will bring them. Many of the other conventional hormonal contraceptives such as implants and infections work similiarly by shutting off ovulation and suppressing the bodies natural hormonal production, and so have the same side effects.
Thankfully there has been a growth of safe, effective contraceptive alternatives for women that bring the freedom and control of their health and fertility, but do not have the side effects that are associated with the synthetic hormones. Understanding your risk profile, the side effects of the contraceptives and their effectiveness allows you to make an informed choice about what is best for you.
Progesterone vs. Progestin
A common misconception is that the hormonal contraceptives ‘regulate’ or ‘balance’ hormones, however the hormones used are actually synthetic forms which do not provide the same benefits as our natural hormones, and in some cases produces harmful side effects.
To give you more of an idea about this, natural progesterone is good for the heart, helps stimulate hair growth, and makes you feel calm and relaxed (it is involved in the production of our feel good neurotransmitter GABA) and healthy levels promote good sleep. Progestin is the correct term for the ‘progesterone’ used in hormonal contraceptives, and they come in different forms most commonly levonorgestrol (in many OCPs, the Mirena IUD and implants). Progestins can increase risk of blood clots, cause hair loss and may cause anxiety and depression.
Side Effects of Hormonal Contraceptives
Some of the more common side effects that women experience from hormonal contraceptives include:
- Depression and anxiety. Some women, especially those aged 15-34 years can experience depression, mood swings or anxiety as a result of the OCP. This still needs more research, however one of the larger studies in this area (1 million women over 13 years) showed that 23% of adolescent women who started the OCP and had not experienced depression before, needed an antidepressant after starting the OCP.
- Blood clots. This is a risk that is so great that for those women who smoke or are overweight, they really should not use the OCP. For women without these factors, their risk of clotting still increases fivefold, and can be greater depending on the type of contraception that they use.
- Metabolic syndrome. Depending on the type of pill you are taking, the OCP can negatively affect cholesterol levels and raise triglycerides. It can also raise blood glucose and reduce insulin sensitivity, potentially leading to insulin resistance. For women choosing to take the OCP as a way to control Poly-cystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS), this can unfortunately worsen the condition as Insulin Resistance is a contributing factor.
- Low libido. This side effect also needs further research, and while I have seen this very common in clinic there is not that many papers which support it. One of the mechanisms is potentially the drop of natural hormones responsible for a healthy libido such as oestrogen and testosterone, but I also suspect that the nutritional deficiencies that can occur as a result of the OCP, such as zinc, magnesium and B vitamins can also play a role. While not necessarily harmful to ones health, it can cause some issues in a relationship and also goes against the concept of greater sexual freedom that should come with the OCP.
- Candida/Thrush and other infections of the reproductive and urinary system. Many women experience thrush whilst on the OCP, especially in the initial period of use. The risk of candida infection is actually higher for IUD use rather than OCP, and is also affected by other factors such as hygiene and antibiotic use.
- Post Pill Amenorrhoea. The standard length of time for a woman’s period to return after stopping the OCP is 3 months, however for some women they may return to normal straight away (yay!) or it can take much, much longer. This can be a real bother when the woman is stopping the OCP to try to fall pregnant. It may be that the pill was masking hormonal problems such as PCOS (a condition that is often made worse by the OCP) or that the woman was put on the OCP at such a young age that her hormones never had a chance to regulate themselves. Or potentially the hormonal production and messenging has been disrupted by the OCP, and the normal time to recover this is longer for some women.
So what are some safer alternatives?
There are many different options for women when choosing a contraceptive method. Understanding the side effects, your own level of risk for these side effects and the effectiveness of the different methods is helpful in choosing what is best for you.
My preference is technology supported Fertility awareness method (FAM), a technique where you chart your cycle based on temperature and/or vaginal mucous consistency and quantity and use this information to learn your cycle and understand the times when you are fertile and not, and either avoid sex or use barrier methods during your fertile period (when using it for contraception). This has been confused with the Billings Method in the past (where one guesses based on the length of their last period when they are due for a period and then counts back 14 days, and avoids sex during this time) however if done correctly, FAM can be as effective as the oral contraceptive pill. The ‘traditional’ method of FAM where one calculates their fertility manually has an effectiveness rating of 75%, however with the use of technology the effective is increased to 93% (for typical use) and 99% (for perfect use). FAM can be used for both avoiding pregnancy, and helping a women understand their fertile times to plan pregnancy. It does not protect against STDs (nor do hormonal contraceptives) but it does come free from side effects. The other downside is that like OCPs and barrier methods, these techniques are subject to user error, which does reduce the effectiveness.
Options include:
- Pen and paper or app supported Fertility awareness method. Apps I recommended include Kindara and Read Your Body, but the purpose of these apps is for record keeping rather than analysis. For true accuracy you must input your cervical mucous, and this is not something that an algorythm in an app can read. Learn from an instructor for approximately 3 months before using this as a method. This is my recommendation of choice.
- Daysy is a fertility monitoring device that learns your cycle and uses this information to report back to you when you are fertile or not, based on your morning temperature. Simply insert the tip of Daysy under your tongue each morning and allow it to take your temperature, input menstruation on the days that you have it. You can tell from either an App or the device itself whether you are in your fertile period or not, or if Daysy is still learning your cycle. Its accuracy is reported at 99.3% however as I mentioned above you cannot rely on an algorhythm to predict fertility and the analysis of cervical mucous must be included for accuracy and reliability. Daysy retails at $499. I no longer recommend this device.
- Natural Cycles in an app which requires you to take your temperature and input the data into the app, and this then calculates the information and tells you whether you are fertile or not. The app is available on a monthly or yearly subscription. In the past I have recommended this app, however with further learning I have realised that temperature alone is not effective at predicting ovulation, and so this poses many concerns with those using it for contraceptive purposes. I no longer recommend this app.
- Condoms and diaphragms. Not everyones favourite but they are side effect free (except when allergic to the substance they are made from, however latex free condoms do exist). They are known to break, and there are many instances where they have been forgotten to be used in the first place.
- IUDs. Not free from side effects, but the side effects are less than other hormonal contraceptives. the copper IUD has no hormonal activity, is effective and not subject to user error. It can potentially worsen period pain for some women, and like all implants has a slight risk associated with the implatation and removal. The Mirena IUD has hormonal activity but seems to be less likely to produce the other risks and side effects than other implants, injections and the OCP.
- Vasectomy and tubal ligation. Effective and long lasting, mostly side effect free, not subject to user error, and with a pearl index of 0.02 for male sterilisation and 0.13 for female sterilisation, this is something that can be considered once a couple has decided they are ready.
Works Cited
Cynthia A. Graham, John Bancroft, Helen A. Doll, Theresa Greco, Amanda Tanner, Does oral contraceptive-induced reduction in free testosterone adversely affect the sexuality or mood of women?, In Psychoneuroendocrinology, Volume 32, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 246-255, ISSN 0306-4530, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.12.011
Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis, Jean-Patrice Baillargeon, Maria J. Iuorno, Daniela J. Jakubowicz, John E. Nestler; A Modern Medical Quandary: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Insulin Resistance, and Oral Contraceptive Pills, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Volume 88, Issue 5, 1 May 2003, Pages 1927–1932, https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021528
Krauss SS, Burkman RT Jr. The metabolic impact of oral contraceptives. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992;167(4 Pt 2):1177-84. PMID: 1415443
Rezk M, Sayyed T, Masood A, Dawood R. Risk of bacterial vaginosis, Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans infection among new users of combined hormonal contraception vs LNG-IUS. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2017 29(1-5). doi: dx.doi.org-10.1080-13625187.2017.1365835
Skovlund CW, Mørch LS, Kessing LV, Lidegaard Ø. Association of Hormonal Contraception With Depression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(11):1154–1162. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2387
van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Vandenbroucke JP, Doggen CJ, Rosendaal FR. The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study. BMJ. 2009 13(339): 10.1136/bmj.b2921
Spinillo, Arsenio et al. The impact of oral contraception on vulvovaginal candidiasis. Contraception , 51(5) , 293 – 297, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(95)00079-P